Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Abe Foxman: Judging a Book by Its Cover and Its Content: A review of "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid" by Jimmy Carter

Judging a Book by Its Cover and Its Content
A review of "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid" by Jimmy Carter
(Simon & Schuster, November 2006)
Posted: November 13, 2006

By Abraham H. Foxman

One should never judge a book by its cover, but in the case of former
President Jimmy Carter's latest work, "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid", we
should make an exception. All one really needs to know about this biased
account is found in the title.

It is truly shocking, at a time of Islamic extremism running rampant, of
suicide bombs polluting cities in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, of Iran
publicly stating its desire to wipe Israel off the map and building nuclear
weapons to achieve that end, of the missile and rocket attacks by Hezbollah
and Hamas on Israel, that Jimmy Carter can to a large degree only see Israel
as the party responsible for conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.

In some ways, Carter's book reminds me of the outlandish paper on "The Israel
Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" by professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen
Walt, though he doesn't go to their extremes. Like them, his examination of
almost every issue concerning the conflict results in blaming Israel for most
or all of what has gone wrong.

Listen to his conclusions: "Israel's continued control and colonization of
Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive peace
agreement in the Holy Land." And, "The bottom line is this: Peace will come to
Israel and the Middle East only when the Israeli government is willing to
comply with international law, with the road map for peace.".

In order to reach such a simplistic and distorted view of the region, Carter
has to ignore or downplay the continuing examples of Palestinian rejection of
Israel and terrorism, which have been part of the equation from the beginning
and which are strong as ever today. He has to minimize or condemn all the
instances of Israel's peace offers and withdrawals, most particularly former
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak's initiative at Camp David in 2000, Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon's disengagement from Gaza in 2005 and current Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert's campaign pledge to withdraw from the West Bank. And he
has to frame every example of Palestinian distress as simply the product of
Israeli repression instead of Palestinian extremism, e.g., the economic
condition of the Palestinians, which has much to do with the continued
terrorism against Israel.

Much as in the paper of Mearsheimer and Walt, one doesn't have to be a
pro-Israel advocate to recognize that the issues in the long conflict are a
lot more complicated than Carter would portray. It's particularly revealing,
that at a time when even many Arab leaders are recognizing the destructive and
dangerous policies of the Palestinians, Carter can hardly bring himself to
speak to such matters.

It is not the goals that Carter seeks that are so troubling -- he calls for a
two-state solution, with Palestinians and Israelis living securely in two
states, which, of course, is the policy of Israel -- but his obsession with
blaming Israel for these goals not being achieved.

The problem with this approach is two-fold. He unjustly encourages
Israel-bashers around the world. The legitimizing factor of being able to
quote a former President of the United States and winner of the Nobel Peace
Prize cannot be overestimated.

Secondly, this gives comfort to the extremists on the Palestinian side who are
reinforced in their extremism by this kind of "analysis." In the end, it is
the Palestinians themselves who are hurt by such a biased approach because
they become even further entrenched in their illusions about weakening Israel
and the need not to change.

As disturbing as Carter's simplistic approach is, however, even more
disturbing is his picking up on the Mearsheimer -Walt theme of Jewish control
of American policy, though in much more abbreviated form and not being the
focus of his work. Referring to U.S. policy and the "condoning" of Israel's
actions, Carter says: "There are constant and vehement political and media
debates in Israel concerning its policies in the West Bank but because of
powerful political, economic, and religious forces in the U.S., Israeli
government decisions are rarely questioned or condemned, voices from Jerusalem
dominate our media, and most American citizens are unaware of circumstances in
the occupied territories." In other words, the old canard and conspiracy
theory of Jewish control of the media, Congress, and the U.S. government is
rearing its ugly head in the person of a former President.

It is sad that Mr. Carter would attempt to use his influence in this way. It
is dangerous because he will be used by elements that want to undermine
support for Israel in this country.

Ultimately, we have faith in the good sense, fairness and understanding of the
American people. They know that life in the Middle East is much more
complicated and will require seeing all sides of the issue, something
President Carter doesn't seem to be interested in doing.

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Subscribe to
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by

Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israƫl in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog

Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Isfake lobby

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory