Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Monday, November 27, 2006

Middle East academics disregard quest for balance

http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2006/11/middle-east-academics-disregard-quest.html

November 23, 2006


Pierre M. Atlas
Middle East academics disregard quest for balance

BOSTON -- When discussing a controversial issue, what does it mean to be "fair
and balanced"?
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061123/OPINION/611230325/-1/ZONES04

This question confounds not only journalists but academics as well. What does
it mean to bring "balance" into the classroom or into scholarly discourse?
Should all perspectives be given equal weight? Do all perspectives deserve
equal weight?

As I write this I am attending the 40th annual conference of the Middle East
Studies Association. MESA is the premier international academic society for
those who study all aspects of the Middle East, its history, peoples,
languages and cultures. More than 2,000 scholars are here from around the
world, professors and graduate students representing numerous academic
disciplines.

Walking through the halls of the conference hotel one hears numerous
languages, including French, Arabic, Farsi, Turkish and Hebrew. MESA is a
dynamic and multi-voice organization, and its conference aims at providing a
safe space to discuss controversial issues in a scholarly manner.

At least, that's the goal. Given the enormous diversity of its membership and
the intensity of the crises in the Middle East today, it shouldn't come as a
surprise that the quest for academic "balance" can get lost in the shuffle.
And that, of course, begs the question: How do we define academic balance?

At a roundtable discussion on last summer's Israel-Lebanon war, the five
panelists, some from Lebanon and some not, expressed nuanced differences when
discussing Lebanon's internal politics. But they uniformly condemned Israel's
actions in the war as "aggression," and repeatedly referred to Hezbollah's
actions as "resistance." Supporters of Israel argue that Hezbollah started the
conflict, and thus it bears ultimate blame for the war's costs. But the
panelists expressed a view held by many in the Arab world that Israel has a
long history of aggression against Lebanon, that it was looking for any excuse
to start the war last summer, and that the United States gave it the green
light.

One panelist showed pictures of the war's massive destruction: numerous shots
of
Lebanese neighborhoods flattened like pancakes, bridges blown apart beyond all
recognition, and weeping mothers at funerals of civilian Lebanese killed by
Israeli bombs. There were no pictures -- or even any mention -- of the
hundreds of Hezbollah rocket attacks on Israeli cities. Lebanon suffered the
bulk of the war's destruction, and more than 10 Lebanese were killed for every
one Israeli. But does that mean that Israeli suffering should be ignored
completely?

Most of the audience's questions were sympathetic to the panelists' point of
view, but not all. One MESA member asked why there was no Israeli perspective
on the panel, and if this disparity was appropriate at an academic conference.
He was told that they did not see the need to have an "Israeli apologist"
sitting beside them.
I asked why the speakers labeled Israel's attacks on Lebanese cities
"aggression," but called Hezbollah's attacks on Israeli cities "resistance."
Doesn't that suggest that some civilian deaths are valued less than others?
Although I didn't get a direct answer, one panelist made the morally
problematic assertion that the quantity of deaths made Israel's actions
"worse" than those of Hezbollah.

The five panelists flatly rejected the notion that they should seek "balance"
on this issue. They said that, as scholars, what mattered was that they "speak
the truth," rather than give equal time to all sides.

But whose truth? Conservative pundits often accuse academia of the "crime" of
postmodern thinking -- of denying that basic facts and certainties exist.
This, they say, leads to moral relativism.

But "truth" is often multi-faceted, consisting of different and sometimes
incompatible perspectives. All of history's totalitarian movements, secular
and religious, have begun with people believing that they possessed "the
Truth" with a capital T. Scholarly discourse, at its best, articulates and
acknowledges different understandings of the truth, and thus serves as an
antidote to such absolutist thinking.

I sat stunned as the panelists asserted that there was only "one truth" to the
Lebanon
conflict. In that moment, my MESA colleagues sounded more like the
conservative attackers of academia than the progressive, postmodern thinkers
they thought themselves to be.


Atlas is assistant professor of political science and director of the
Franciscan Center for Global Studies at Marian College. Contact him at
patlas@marian.edu.


Copyright 2006 IndyStar.com. All rights reserved


Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2006/11/middle-east-academics-disregard-quest.html. Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment



<< Home


FREE EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION
Subscribe to
ZNN
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by groups.yahoo.com


Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israƫl in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israpundit
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Z-Word
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
UN-Biased
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Zionism
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog
Liberticracia
CNPublications
SEO

Reference
Zionism
Anti-Semitism
Anti-Zionism
Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Bible
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Islamism
Jihad
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Israel
Jew
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism
Russian

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Experimental
Isfake lobby
Mysterology

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products
Mezuzah

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]


RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory