Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Friday, January 19, 2007

Abdullah: Jordan will develop nuclear power

Last update - 03:12 19/01/2007
Abdullah: Jordan will develop nuclear power
By Akiva Eldar, Haaretz Correspondent

Jordan aspires to develop nuclear power for peaceful purposes and believes
that unless all sides move quickly toward a peace settlement in the region,
the recent confrontation in Lebanon is only a hint of disasters to come. In
an exclusive interview with Haaretz on Thursday, King Abdullah II of Jordan
spoke with Akiva Eldar:

"I can say that on behalf of the U.S. president and the secretary of state,
and I've talked to both, that they're very serious and very committed to
moving the peace process forward, because they realize the dynamics of the
region at the moment.

"And this is the opportunity to reach out to the Palestinians and the
Israelis and say, look, this is the golden chance and to an extent, maybe
the last possibility. We had a conflict this summer.

"The frequency of conflict in this region is extremely alarming, and the
perception, I believe, among Arabs, and partly among Israelis, is that in
the summer Israel lost this round... And that creates a very difficult and a
very dangerous precedence for radical thinking in the area. The stakes are
getting higher and higher.

"So this is an opportunity to reach out to each other and make sure that the
crisis of this summer doesn't happen again. If we don't move the peace
process forward, it's only a matter of time until there is a conflict
between Israel and somebody else in the region. And I think it's coming
sooner rather than later.

"We all need to work together, because solving the Israeli-Palestinian
problem, allows us to tackle the other issues around us. All of us are
looking at Iraq with concern, we don't know what's going to happen in
Lebanon, although we hope that they're moving in the right direction...
Whether people like it or not, the linchpin is always the
Israeli-Palestinian problem."

Do you see a clear link between the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the
Iranian nuclear threat and the threat of terrorism?

"Through Hamas, Iran has been able to buy itself a seat on the table in
talking about the Palestinian issue. And, as a result, through Hamas it does
play a role in the issue of the Palestinians, as strange as that should

"If we start moving the process forward, then there's less reason for
engagement on the Palestinian issue.

"But, the rules have changed on the nuclear subject throughout the whole
region. Where I think Jordan was saying, 'we'd like to have a nuclear-free
zone in the area,' after this summer, everybody's going for nuclear

"The Egyptians are looking for a nuclear program. The GCC [Gulf Cooperation
Council] are looking at one, and we are actually looking at nuclear power
for peaceful and energy purposes. We've been discussing it with the West.

"I personally believe that any country that has a nuclear program should
conform to international regulations and should have international
regulatory bodies that check to make sure that any nuclear program moves in
the right direction."

In other words, you're saying that you expect Israel to join the NPT.

"What's expected from us should be a standard across the board. We want to
make sure this is used for energy. What we don't want is an arms race to
come out of this. As we become part of an international body and its
international regulations are accepted by all of us, then we become a united

Would you first deal with the Palestinian track and then move on to the
Syrian-Lebanese track?

"Syria seems to be of tremendous interest in the Israeli public opinion, but
I think that the priority, if you want to get the guarantees that Israel
wants for a stable future, the core issue takes the priority. We have to
launch the Palestinian process and then hope that things will go easier with
the other players.

"You have to start with the Palestinian first and look at the other ones as
a close second. I would hedge my bets on how successful the other tracks
would be if the Palestinian one is not solved. And, we don't know how much
of a smokescreen the other tracks would be and if we don't get the right
nuances for what we need on the ground for the next year, then the future
for us looks extremely dismal, for all of us in the region, if we don't move
the process along.

"What happened this summer is just a taste of a lot of worse things to come
if we don't change the direction of this discord.

"We're all on the same boat. The security and the future of Jordan is
hand-in-hand with the future of the Palestinians and the Israelis. ... So, a
failure for us is a failure for you, and vice versa."

How do you think the Americans should further the process?

"You have the road map, you have Taba, you have the Geneva Accords. So, we
don't have to go back to the drawing board. Most of us know the facts and
the issues extremely well. My only issue about the road map is that
circumstances have changed since the road map was launched, and the sort of
long drawn out phase approach, I don't think works anymore. So, we're
looking at combining phases, I think, to move people as quickly as possible.
The silent majority can be easily intimidated or swayed. And, I promise you,
if tomorrow, [Prime Minister Ehud] Olmert and President [Palestinian
Authority Chairman Mahmoud] Abbas sit down and shake hands and launch a
peace process, there'll be extremists on either side that create violence
and loss of life to try and destabilize the conflict. That is a given. We
have to be stronger than that to be able to move the process forward."

Would you suggest we go back to Yitzhak Rabin's formula: to pursue the peace
process as if there were no terrorism, and to fight terrorism as if there
were no peace process?

"I personally believe that my father's last biggest disappointment and
sadness to him was that he lost a partner for peace. And, he believed that
if PM Rabin hadn't been assassinated, we wouldn't be talking about a peace
process today. In the last years of His Majesty's life, I saw him looking at
the Middle East and realizing that there wasn't somebody with the courage to
be able to take the process forward. It is our responsibility to move it

"His late Majesty, when he started discussions with prime minister Rabin,
they both looked at it the same way, I mean these were two statesmen that
looked at it from an emotional point of view, in that 'who is my partner on
the other side? What are his fears and his insecurities?' If I could put
myself in his shoes then I could understand what to negotiate ... it was a
unique relationship between His Majesty and Rabin. When it came to the
Arab-Israeli Peace Initiative, we tried to do the same thing. An agreed
solution on the issue of refugees.

"Why do we want a two-state solution? We want a two-state solution because
we envisage the future of Israel not just having borders with Jordan, Syria
or Egypt. The future of Israelis, if I was to put myself in your shoes, is
to be welcomed from Morocco on the Atlantic to Oman on the Indian Ocean. I
think that is the prize for the Israelis. But that comes at a price and that
is the future of the Palestinians. So although we're talking politics, I
think that we have a physical problem and we're running out of time, maybe
the wall, maybe the settlements, the lack of hope for the Palestinians will
bring us to a point in time in the near future where a two-state solution is
no longer anything concrete to talk about, then what happens? If we don't
solve the Israeli-Palestinian issue, then we may never be able to solve the
Arab-Israeli issue. Is this what we want to give our children? Do they have
to be brought up like we were brought up ... in conflict or do we want to
give them hope?"

If you were Israel's prime minister, would you settle for a hudna?

"I mean, you talk about the hudna. Tell me what you mean about hudna. If you
and I have a problem and we want to go to the endgame, then we say, let's
hold off with each other so we can have an atmosphere to sit down and talk.
If it's a hudna, you do your thing and I do my thing for x amount of years
and then we'll decide what happens. No, that doesn't solve the problem. In
my vocabulary, a hudna is a truce that allows people to sit around the table
to solve the problem, which I believe is a two-state solution, then I
support that type of hudna. But a hudna to say you mind your business and
I'll mind mine for an indefinite period of time really doesn't get us
anywhere, does it?"

But in our case, Hamas insists on its refusal to recognize even our right to
exists. So, what kind of solution can we talk to Hamas about?

"But, if you've noticed, and I'm not agreeing with either side, but even the
language recently coming from Hamas, even from the Damascus bureau, is quite
interesting. Palestinians are suffering terribly, and I have major concerns.
I hear from Israeli politicians that we don't have a partner for peace. But
the clock is ticking and we're running out of opportunity.

"Palestinians tend to ask, where is the Arab street? Where are the Arab
leaders? We've always been there to support the Palestinians and a two-state
solution, but today, where are the Palestinians for themselves? My concern
is that as we're trying to move the process forward, it may be the
Palestinians that may lose the future of Palestine if they don't get their
act together, if they don't put their differences aside. At the end of the
day, a cohesive Palestinian leadership that can negotiate the future of
Palestine is what's needed today, and if we don't have that in six months or
a year, then there may not be a two-state solution and I fear that the
Palestinians may be the ones to lose."

There are Israeli politicians who say that publicly Jordan supports a
full-fledged Palestinian state, but off-the-record that it is not very
excited about having a Palestinian state right there in the Jordan valley
and would rather have Israel on the other side of its border. What would you
say to them?

"I do not know anybody, any Jordanian, who would say that there is a shred
of common sense to that. The true future of our little area is going to be
Israeli, Palestinian and Jordanian, and it has to be separate entities.
There are also Israelis who want to push the problem to Jordan. An
independent Palestinian state allows us a different future of how we move
economically, socially and even politically."

Jordan never gave up playing a constructive role in the holy cities of
Jerusalem. Do you see a Jordanian role in Jerusalem as part of a final
status solution?

"I look at Jerusalem as being a beacon for the three monotheistic religions.
Now, where Jordan plays a role is obviously from a Muslim point of view, we,
as Hashemites, have a historical role in Jerusalem, but also all the
Christian churches are credited to us. So, there is obviously a role for
Jordan in finding a solution to Jerusalem that is acceptable to all of us.
Jordan will be a very positive element in that."

You're in a very special position, because Jordan is caught right in the
middle of two conflicts: Iraq and Palestine. Is the solution for Iraq
sending more troops?

"Iraq is a challenge that is as important to Jordan as it is to Israel, as
it is to Egypt, as it is to any other country - and to the U.S.

"All we can say about Iraq is that the president has listened to the Maliki
government. He's come up with a statement saying, I'm going to benchmark
you, but you need to make some major changes. "

Next month marks eight years since your coronation. You haven't visited us
yet. When are you coming to Israel?

"We're hoping that in the near future, and that could be weeks or maybe in a
month or two, there'll be an opportunity to re-launch our final chance for a
future for all of us in the region. And, if we're successful in doing that,
then this will allow me to come and visit, and to try and bring the parties
closer and closer together. I'm quite willing to explain the Arab proposal
to the Israeli people and to create an internal dialogue about this issue.
The Arabs are coming to say we want peace, and we want formal relations.
And, as a human being, I can't understand how anybody would not want that.

"We look at the neighborhood and we're all concerned. But, the people who
need to be equally concerned are the Israelis and sometimes, they see the
conflict happening in the Middle East and think well, that's not our
problem. But unfortunately, everything that happens in the Middle East is
interlinked. And so, this is a challenge we all face."


Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.



    There really is no need for nuclear power for electricity in the Middle East because there is a simple mature technology available that can deliver huge amounts of clean energy without any of the headaches of nuclear power.

    I refer to 'concentrating solar power' (CSP), the technique of concentrating sunlight using mirrors to create heat, and then using the heat to raise steam and drive turbines and generators, just like a conventional power station. It is possible to store solar heat in melted salts so that electricity generation may continue through the night or on cloudy days. This technology has been generating electricity successfully in California since 1985 and half a million Californians currently get their electricity from this source. CSP plants are now being planned or built in many parts of the world.

    CSP works best in hot deserts and, of course these are accessible to Jordan. But it is feasible and economic to transmit solar electricity over very long distances using highly-efficient 'HVDC' transmission lines. With transmission losses at about 3% per 1000 km, solar electricity may, for example, be transmitted from North Africa to London with only about 10% loss of power. A large-scale HVDC transmission grid has also been proposed by the wind energy company Airtricity as a means of optimising the use of wind power throughout Europe.

    In the recent 'TRANS-CSP' report commissioned by the German government, it is estimated that CSP electricity, imported from North Africa and the Middle East, could become one of the cheapest sources of electricity in Europe, including the cost of transmission. That report shows in great detail how Europe can meet all its needs for electricity, make deep cuts in CO2 emissions, and phase out nuclear power at the same time.

    CSP offers substantial benefits to people in North Africa and the Middle East, including desalination of sea water using waste heat from electricity generation - a major benefit in arid regions. In addition, the provision of shaded areas under the solar mirrors can be used for many purposes including horticulture using desalinated sea water. And of course, there would be plentiful supplies of inexpensive, pollution-free electricity and earnings from the export of that electricity to countries with less sunshine.

    Further information about CSP may be found at and . Copies of the TRANS-CSP report may be downloaded from . The many problems associated with nuclear power are summarised at .


    Robert Palgrave

    By Blogger RobertP, At January 20, 2007 9:46:00 AM GMT+00:00  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Subscribe to
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by

Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israƫl in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog

Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Isfake lobby

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory