Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Thursday, March 8, 2007

Dismantling history or dismantling our future?

The kibbutzim "owe" $27 Billion. It is well to ask how they came to owe all this money and what they did with it. Did they buy Greek Islands? Bail out rug factories? Give their daughters opulent weddings? Or did they contract these debts in the service of Israel? Settlers are "compensated" for giving up land and housing that did not belong to them in the first place, while kibbutzim are punished for building Israel.
Is it only history that we are dismantling, or are we dismantling our future?

The kibbutzim feel like they've been cheated
By Meirav Arlosoroff

Suckers three times, because his kibbutz is one of the 60 economically strong kibbutzim whose involvement in the debt settlement arrangement for the kibbutzim was only contributory: they did not benefit from the debt forgiveness and in keeping with the principle of mutual responsibility among the kibbutzim, they were obligated by the Kibbutz Movement to pay from their own pockets for the improvement of the economic situation of other failing kibbutzim.
Now, when they are being asked to donate 25 percent of the Tnuva shares to the state as well, 17 of these 60 kibbutzim are saying no.
Just three months ago the kibbutzim reached a final agreement with the government. This arrangement, which effectively consisted of four separate arrangements, covered the erasure of kibbutz debts totaling NIS 18.4 billion and the rescheduling of the repayment of an additional NIS 9 billion. The state bore the main cost of the arrangement, with the banks shouldering the rest.
In exchange, the kibbutzim transferred 20,000 dunams (5,000 acres) of land to the state with an estimated real estate value of NIS 1.5 billion, although some claim this value could triple when the land is developed. In addition, the kibbutzim committed to transferring 25 percent of their Tnuva shares to the state and the banks. Based on the Apax deal, the shares in question are worth about $110 million, while the state's portion of the shares is valued at $70 million.
Even according to the most optimistic estimates, the assets paid by the kibbutzim (in exchange for the erasure and rescheduling of NIS 27 billion in debt) are not worth more than NIS 4 billion. The arrangement's supporters claim that any calculation must also include the fact that by agreeing to the arrangement the state prevented a humanitarian and social tragedy; without the arrangement, the 120,000 affected kibbutz members would have been out on the street, with no property and no pensions. The state would also not have been able to generate any revenue from the privatization of the banks, as absent an arrangement it would have been impossible to sell the banks, which were in a de facto state of bankruptcy. The arrangement's proponents are probably right, and the reality is that the kibbutzim paid a relatively small sum for being saved from financial ruin.
This still does not prevent the kibbutzim from coming out of the deal feeling like suckers. It turns out that not only the 17 strongest kibbutz, but also the weakest kibbutzim - the ones whose debts were erased - share this feeling, mainly because the kibbutzim were forced to give up land and Tnuva shares, while the moshavim received a much more generous debt arrangement and were not required to pay anything at all. Now the kibbutzim are demanding an explanation and accusing the Kibbutz Movement's leadership in the 1990s of failing its responsibility by agreeing to the terms of the arrangement.
"The concession of the Tnuva shares was made in good faith," said a senior official in the Kibbutz Movement. "No one in the kibbutz leadership imagined that Tnuva would ever be sold or privatized. This was during another period, and our representatives in the debt arrangement negotiations signed because they believed the promissory note would never be called."
So now the truth is out: the kibbutzim never thought they would have to hand over Tnuva shares in exchange for the debt erasure granted to them. They thought that like the moshavim, they would be able to evade repaying the state. Now that the repayment date has arrived, the kibbutzim are not only angry but doing everything they can to reduce the sum the state will receive for the NIS 27 billion arrangement.
The kibbutzim have now won Apax's support, which has announced that it will not purchase Tnuva if the state insists on continuing to hold 6.75 percent of the enterprise's shares. Apax is demanding that the state sell its shares immediately and cease to be a shareholder. This, while the kibbutzim retain the right to hold shares as well as the option to sell their shares to Apax at the deal price over the next three years. This means that the kibbutzim can benefit from an increase in Tnuva's value under Apax management, and are guaranteed that the value of their shares will not decline in the next three years.
"Like demanding ransom," is how the Kibbutz Movement leadership defined the state's request for the same rights in the deal as those enjoyed by the kibbutzim. NIS 18.4 billion will apparently not make them change their minds.

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Subscribe to
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by

Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israƫl in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog

Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Isfake lobby

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory