Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Friday, March 9, 2007

Lebanon War: Applying whitewash

An elaborate fantasy has been created, whereby there is doubt about the ultimate responsibility for the failures of the Lebanon war. Once this fantasy is believed, it is possible to think that the fate of Ehud Olmert and his government should depend on this or that report.
Everyone could see with their own eyes what happened to civil defense in the north. Everyone could see that deployment or non-deployment of the army in Lebanon was capricious, hesitant and child-like.
While there is doubt about the details of who is responsible at the lower levels for which failure, there can be no doubt that the ultimate responsibility for a failed war always rests with the head of state. Olmert initiated the war without checking readiness of the home front and the IDF. Olmert ultimately made the decisions about deployment or non-deployment of reserves. Many others, including Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were no doubt guilty of contributory negligence, but they were not driving the vehicle when it hit the tree.
This article below, is a part of that fantasy. We don't need a panel of jurists to tell us that rockets should not have been falling on the north for about a month with no defense, and we know who ordered it. Anyhow, the interim Winograd report will not make personal recommendations, and anyhow they are not binging. And anyhow, there is nobody less bad than Olmert available to replace him, is there?
Ami Isseroff

Olmert buys some time
By Amos Harel

What sounded last weekend like the threatening roar of an approaching earthquake ended midweek in a whimper. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert emerged victorious from the present round. A surprising coalition of politicians, legal experts and senior officers united against State Comptroller Micha Lindenstrauss and blocked him last Tuesday from releasing the main points of his highly critical report on the performance of the home front. Fans of political drama will not have to wait long, however. The interim report of the Winograd Committee examining the war in Lebanon is slated for release by the end of the month, by which time procedural reasons to stem the tide will be hard to come by. In the end, Olmert and Defense Minister Amir Peretz bought themselves only a little time. The outburst of open hostility between the two in Tuesday's cabinet meeting, immediately after the prime minister's temporary victory over the state comptroller, attests to their awareness of this fact.
Unfortunately for him, the chief of the Home Front Command (HFC), Yitzhak (Jerry) Gershon, was caught in the crossfire. Gershon is justified in fearing that he may be one of the main casualties of the comptroller's report. He was summoned three times to testify before Lindenstrauss' people, who asked him some tough questions. And if it is agreed that the performance of the Home Front during the war was disastrous, it is clear that the head of the branch is likely to be a target of the report. When the idea arose in the Military Advocate General's Office of petitioning against the discussion in the Knesset State Control Committee (where the comptroller planned to present the main points of the report), officials looked for a senior officer whose name could be added as a petitioner. Gershon agreed, partly because the jurists explained that this would help officers who could be harmed by the report, many of whom are his subordinates. "I'm responsible for the deeds of my people. I'm the address, as long as nobody acted with malice or did something criminal," Gershon said this week in conversations with his subordinates.
The argument - according to which those liable to be harmed were not given a fair chance to defend themselves before the release of the main points - convinced even the attorney general, the Knesset legal adviser and to some extent the High Court of Justice as well, which imposed restrictions on the deliberations in the committee and crippled the comptroller's plan. Gershon was complimented this week by colleagues on the General Staff for his willingness to pitch in, but in fact some of his close associates suggested that he refrain from filing the petition and even after the fact believed it was a mistake.
Gershon's action helped Olmert and the Israel Defense Forces, but not necessarily Gershon himself. Some people who spoke with him this week had the impression that he is having some regrets, that maybe he was too naive in agreeing to the petition, which works to the benefit of forces greater than he. It may really not be such a great source of pride to be the first IDF general to submit a petition against a state authority. The new chief of staff, Lieutenant General Gabi Ashkenazi, surprised the senior officers by not preventing Gershon and the IDF from becoming involved in the legal-political imbroglio. At least one of his predecessors in the job says that had he been in Ashkenazi's place, he would have forbidden the filing of the petition, with all due respect to the sacred autonomy of the Military Advocate General.
Before the Lebanon war Gershon, whose record includes a successful period as commander of IDF forces in the West Bank at the height of the second intifada, was thought to be on the shortlist to become the next head of the Central Command. Since the war his chances have decreased. After all, the report will be published despite the delaying tactics, and the HFC is responsible for some of the failures. This may be somewhat unfair, since the HFC at least demonstrated initiative, resourcefulness and good will during the war, in the face of the impotence demonstrated by many of the local authorities and rescue organizations. Moreover, soon after assuming the HFC command, Gershon became the first person to call for the creation of a national body to coordinate the handling of the home front and to declare that the HFC did not have the powers needed to fill that role.
Herein lies part of the problem: The job of HFC chief is usually considered a stepping stone to loftier positions. Unlike the other area commands (Northern, Central, Southern), however, the Home Front is an area of special expertise to which the army usually sends new generals with no experience in the field. This does not prevent every new general in the command from trying to reinvent the wheel within a few months of his arrival, only to have his successor do the same thing.
If Gershon is ambivalent about the results of the legal confrontation this week, in the case of Lindenstrauss the score is clear: In this round the comptroller was defeated. He played into the hands of the prime minister, who managed to plant a reasonable doubt among broad sections of the media and the public regarding any statement by Lindenstrauss, claiming that the comptroller has it in for him personally. Nor did the comptroller's publicity-hunting help.
An interesting question came up this week regarding the uncharacteristic silence of Amir Peretz in this affair. Did the defense minister leave the field to the prime minister and the head of the HFC because they did his work for him? Peretz disappeared from the public discussion about the home front, although he is certainly as least as responsible for the failures as are Olmert, former chief of staff Dan Halutz or Gershon.
It is doubtful whether the comptroller's tactical errors will blunt the impression left by his conclusions, the publication of which has been postponed. The more time passes since the war, the more difficult it is for the government to sell its version of events. Israel's few achievements in the campaign are gradually being eroded: Hezbollah, which had been pushed back from the border, is now rearming itself undisturbed. The deployment of the international force along the border (which is taking almost no action against the weapons stockpiles of the Shi'ite organization) is balanced out by Hezbollah's success in actively threatening the stability of the government of Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. In early August, at the beginning of the war, Olmert could still speak of a "great victory" for Israel. In September, after it ended, then chief of staff Dan Halutz still claimed that "we won on points." Today, almost nobody is speaking in such terms.
Stepping into the vacuum
The same is true of the home front. The 600 pages of the comptroller's report will present in-depth analyses and recommendations for change, but anyone who spent time in the North during the war already knows the bottom line. When the home front became the front line, the country abandoned the region's residents. Voluntary organizations stepped into the vacuum left behind by government ministries and some of the local councils. Billionaire Arcadi Gaydamak assessed the situation in a more organized manner than the government did, and apparently offered more assistance to residents as well. Most of those who were able to do so fled the affected areas in the first two weeks. Those who remained in the line of fire were mainly those who had no choice: the ill, the poor, the new immigrants.
A senior civil servant who spent most of the war traveling among the bomb shelters reported feeling "tremendous shame. It was a disgrace. There was great chaos and the government was not sufficiently in evidence. I quickly learned that the situation depended mainly on the ability of the local council. Strong municipalities like Haifa and Carmiel functioned well. In Kiryat Shmona and Safed, the situation was absolutely terrible." Do any of us still need the comptroller in order to know that these words reflect the true picture of the situation? The claim made by Olmert to the effect that the London blitz was worse is simply irrelevant.
Three former judges who served concurrently as district court presidents are writing the three main documents of the recent period: the Zeiler report, the Lindenstrauss report, the Winograd report. The first two have already been sharply criticized for their sweeping conclusions, an absence of judicial balance, the overenthusiastic response to the wooing of the media. And yet there is something very symbolic in this process - as though it took three representatives of another, older generation to clarify to the present-day office holders the seriousness of the breakdown in the performance of official bodies.

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Subscribe to
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by

Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israƫl in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog

Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Isfake lobby

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory