Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Who said what at Annapolis and what does it mean?

http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2007/11/who-said-what-at-annapolis-and-what.html

Note - The author asserts:
"As major general (res.) Giora Eyland commented in his article in Yediot Ahronot: "Experience shows that negotiations can lead to worse situations", and concluded, "Israel has clearly given up the principle of refusing to discuss the permanent settlement before it sees a solution to the security problems … what have we received in exchange exactly?""
 
But Ehud Olmert said in an interview that this is not the case:
 
During an interview with Israeli journalists in Washington, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said: ''No concessions will be discussed until the conditions laid down by the road map are met. This was recalled very clearly in the joint statement signed last night. The Palestinians, ande the Americans, are aware of this''.  (Guysen.International.News)
Ami Isseroff
 

And thanks to Egypt!
The Arab states are concerned over fundamentalism at home—not when they are anywhere else, and especially not in Israel
Zalman Shoval (11/26/2007)

The writer is a former Knesset member and Israeli ambassador to Washington and is a member of the Likud movement.
 
 
 
The article was published in the press and appears here with the author's kind permission
 
Perhaps we should be grateful to Egypt for letting some 80 Hamas members and activists from other terrorist groups, including some trained in Iran, to cross the border (on Egyptian buses) into Gaza. Grateful for what?. For the fact that Cairo has given us a stark reminder of how things really are in the Middle East and what Israel's attitude to the terms "peace" and "agreements" with the Arab world should be.
 
One thing that this should teach us straight away concerns the idea that the fears of the "moderate" Arab states'—Egypt, Saudi Arabia, etc.—regarding Islamic fundamentalism makes them a natural ally of Israel. This is simply not true; although they are very worried about fundamentalism in their own back yard, they are not bothered when Islamic fundamentalists are in somebody else's country, especially if it is Israel. In other words, these countries only oppose Islamic fundamentalism (and isn't Saudi Wahabism fundamentalist?) if it threatens their own security and political rule. And what lies behind the latest deal between Egypt and Hamas? When Egypt wanted Hamas to hand over a wanted al-Qaeda operative it had no qualms about helping the Islamicist Palestinians wanted by Israel to return to the Gaza Strip.
 
This is no isolated incident and it was preceded by massive arms transfers from Egypt to Gaza with the purpose of arming and equipping the Hamas army that is taking shape there. Even without active cooperation between the Egyptian authorities and Hamas they are unquestionably treat these activities with calculated indifference.
 
But no less than these, the dirty business on the Gaza-Egypt border brings to mind the international summit at Annapolis and the offers Israel might be pushed to make. The government's "original sin" was deciding to be part of this circus that is about to take place in Annapolis. "We had no choice" they will say, "we couldn't ignore Secretary of State Rice's demands". Maybe. But even if that is so, Israeli diplomacy could have at least insisted as it did before the Madrid Summit, on being given a document of commitment or guarantees that would spare Jerusalem unpleasant surprises.
 
Foreign Ministry Livni was right on the button in her speech to the United Nations Assembly when she said that peace is made through direct bilateral negotiations—but how is that consistent with attending a forum in which Israel will find itself more or less isolated against all the members of the Arab League, the United Nations, the European Union, Russia…and America, one of whose motives for convening the summit is to lobby Saudi Arabia and the other Arab states to help save it from the Iraqi bog. Perhaps due to naiveté or inexperience the Secretary of Defense and her colleagues believed at first at least that involving the Arab states in the summit would not only link them in a practical way to the peace process but also help to moderate Palestinian demands.
 
Not surprisingly what has happened is the exact opposite: in their public statements and demands of Israel, the Arab leaders in fact have poured more oil on the fire of Palestinian extremism (which is why the American senate called on the State Department to pressure the Arab countries and chiefly the Saudis to assist in the peace effort—instead of sabotaging it).
 
And what about the Egypt-Hamas terrorist deal and the Annapolis summit? The first conclusion for anyone who does not wishes to appear blind is clear: apparently Israel and the rest of the world cannot trust the Arab states, including those that have signed or will in sign peace agreements with Israel, to fully and faithfully honor their commitments—with the exception perhaps of Jordan, which has a clear interest in enduring peace with Israel.
 
Another lesson: if anyone believes that some international force or another will guarantee our security they should ask themselves what happened to the European "monitors" supposedly monitoring the border crossings between Egypt and Gaza, which melted away as soon as Hamas took control of Gaza (the same way the UN soldiers disappeared from Sinai in 1967). Conclusion: only through its own strength and having defendable borders will Israel ensure a reasonable degree of security—and that of course applies to the Palestinian state that policy makers in Washington and Jerusalem talk about almost yearningly.
 
Apparently, the prime minister believes he can control the situation regardless of what is said and agreed at Annapolis. This is a dangerous delusion. As major general (res.) Giora Eyland commented in his article in Yediot Ahronot: "Experience shows that negotiations can lead to worse situations", and concluded, "Israel has clearly given up the principle of refusing to discuss the permanent settlement before it sees a solution to the security problems … what have we received in exchange exactly?"


Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2007/11/who-said-what-at-annapolis-and-what.html. Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment



<< Home


FREE EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION
Subscribe to
ZNN
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by groups.yahoo.com


Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israël in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israpundit
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Z-Word
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
UN-Biased
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Zionism
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog
Liberticracia
CNPublications
SEO

Reference
Zionism
Anti-Semitism
Anti-Zionism
Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Bible
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Islamism
Jihad
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Israel
Jew
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism
Russian

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Experimental
Isfake lobby
Mysterology

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products
Mezuzah

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]


RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory