Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Iran's great victory

IAEA has been rubber-stamping Iranian evasion of nuclear safeguards. But this conclusion is rather obvious:
The conclusion is that if during the coming year - by the end of George Bush's term - the American president does not order a military operation against Iran's nuclear sites, it is doubtful whether it would be possible to prevent Iran from turning into a nuclear state. Jerusalem must start getting used to this and prepare for a "new Middle East."
Ami Isseroff
Iran's great victory
By Reuven Pedatzur
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad congratulated his nation earlier this week for its "great victory" following the release of the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) report last Friday, and for good reason.
The "great [Iranian] nation's" perseverance enabled the government to do everything to restore Iran's rights in the nuclear energy field, in both national and international arenas, he said.
Ahmadinejad had someone he could count on when, with a broad smile, he called on the United States to apologize to Iran and even compensate it for America's "errors."
IAEA director Mohamed ElBaradei played into the Iranians' hands again. Not only did he help their president to celebrate in Tehran, he also gave them another extension on their way to completing their nuclear weapons development.
Once again, as expected, ElBaradei missed the opportunity to unite the international community around the efforts to prevent Iran's nuclearization.
ElBaradei continued to use evasive language in the periodical report on Iran he released at the end of last week. He adamantly refuses to state the obvious. Referring to Iran's simulations and experiments with high-impact explosives and planned ballistic missile warheads, ElBaradei writes that there is no indication linking these activities to "nuclear materials." The IAEA cannot therefore reach a clear decision about the Iranian nuclear program's character, he writes.
In other words, it is clear even to ElBaradei that Iran is concealing, misleading and ignoring the Security Council's resolutions, yet he refrains from stating explicitly that it is developing nuclear arms.
It is clear that the Iranians have no reason or need to develop advanced explosive missile heads unless they intend to equip them with nuclear weapons. It is also obvious that there is no connection between developing energy for peaceful purposes and the Green Salt Project. This allegedly secretive project, which Iran has been working on for years and which the CIA told the IAEA about, consists of an explicit design for nuclear bombs.
Unfortunately ElBaradei's convoluted, problematic report received moral support from the American intelligence community in December, which said among other things that Iran had already abandoned the nuclear weapons component in its development programs in 2003.
It makes no difference that the U.S. director of National Intelligence, J. Michael McConnell, recently admitted he had been wrong in Congress, making it clear that he regretted the way the report had been presented.
McConnell said the intelligence community had erred, and that Iran was advancing on the most complicated part in nuclear production, the bomb, producing fuel based on enriched uranium. Well said, but too late.
Thus, the rear-guard action that the Bush administration is trying to lead now focuses on the attempt to draft a Security Council resolution for another round of sanctions against Iran - a move doomed to fail as the attempts to persuade Iran to back down from its nuclear program failed.
"Time is against us," U.S. Ambassador to the UN Zalmay Khalilzad said this week.
Two previous rounds of sanctions, in December 2006 and last March, failed to bring a change in Iran's nuclear policy. Britain and France have now presented the Security Council with a resolution proposal for additional sanctions, including restricting cargo to and from Iran, imposing a travel ban on Iranians visiting selected countries, confiscating assets of people involved in Iran's nuclear program, and tightening supervision over Iranian financial institutions.
Even if Russia and China do not object, as expected, and the Security Council adopts the proposal, it is doubtful whether this would unduly upset the Iranians.
The conclusion is that if during the coming year - by the end of George Bush's term - the American president does not order a military operation against Iran's nuclear sites, it is doubtful whether it would be possible to prevent Iran from turning into a nuclear state. Jerusalem must start getting used to this and prepare for a "new Middle East."

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.


Post a Comment

<< Home

Subscribe to
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by

Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israƫl in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog

Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Isfake lobby

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]

RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory