Israel News | Zionism Israel Center | Zionism History | Zionism Definitions | ZioNation | Forum | Zionism FAQ | Maps| Edit

Sunday, September 13, 2009

Lawyers challenge Goldstone's UN Gaza Report - Report to condemn Israel.

http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/09/lawyers-challenge-goldstones-un-gaza.html

Another media circus organized by the UN - but this one is presided over by a nominal Zionist. The conclusions of the report were evidently known before the investingation. The list of lawyers challenging the report should be much larger. Ami Isseroff

U.N.'s Imminent Gaza Report Challenged by 50 U.K. & Canadian Lawyers for 'Bias'
Published by
UN Watch
- at September 13, 2009 in Goldstone "Fact Finding" Mission for UNHRC and Human Rights Council (UNHRC).
U.N.'s Imminent Gaza Report Challenged by 50 U.K. & Canadian Lawyers for 'Bias'
 
Arab and Islamic States Plan to Use Goldstone Report for Indictment of Israel by International Criminal Court
 
Geneva, Sept. 13, 2009 - An unprecedented team of fifty British and Canadian lawyers are challenging the refusal of a U.N. investigator to step down from an inquiry on the recent Gaza conflict, arguing that London School of Economics professor Christine Chinkin's participation on the panel - after she declared Israel guilty prior to seeing any evidence - "necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report."
 
Arab and Islamic countries are hoping to use the report, by a UN Human Rights Council inquiry headed by former South African judge Richard Goldstone — and due for release today — to indict Israel at the International Criminal Court, a move recently encouraged by UN rights chief Navi Pillay. However, Geneva diplomats say U.S. and Western states will block any such attempt.
 
In submissions filed separately from both countries, prominent attorneys from law firms and human rights organizations in Great Britain and Canada are challenging the U.N.'s rejection of a request that Chinkin be disqualified due to her January condemnation of Israel on the very disputed issues that the inquiry is meant to impartially examine.
 
In early May, UN  Watch, a Geneva non-governmental organization that monitors the world body's human rights system, appeared before the U.N. panel to urge Goldstone and the other members to disqualify Chinkin, invoking "the impartiality principle that Goldstone promised to uphold," and "the due process requirements of morality, logic and international law."
 
Despite the NGO's filing of legal briefs in July and August, as reported by Agence France Presse and Deutsche Presse Agentur, the Goldstone mission waited until recently to respond, summarily rejecting the petition. UN Watch's appeal last week to the new president of the Human Rights Council, Belgian ambassador Alex van Meeuwen, received no response. The team of 50 lawyers has now launched a direct appeal to Chinkin that she step down.
 
In an August interview with South Africa's Business Day, Goldstone admitted that "If it had been a judicial inquiry, that letter [Chinkin] signed would have been a ground for disqualification."
 
According to Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, "Goldstone's implied argument that his inquiry is somehow exempt from the impartiality rule simply defies logic, morality and established international law. At the same time, Goldstone's effective admission that his report is the product of something other than an impartial panel seriously calls into question the legal possibility of attributing any evidentiary weight or credibility to their report."
 
Apart from Chinkin, the other three members of the panel — Goldstone, Hina Jilani, and Desmond Travers — also implied Israeli guilt prior to their seeing any evidence, declaring in March that "The events in Gaza have shocked us to the core."
 
According to Neuer, "the Arab-controlled Human Rights Council deliberately selected individuals who made up their mind well in advance not only that Israel was guilty, but that a democratic state with an imperfect but respected legal system should be considered the same as or worse than Hamas, a group whose very raison d'etre is the killing and terrorizing of civilians."
 
The two separate appeals by 50 British and Canadian lawyers follow below. For more information, see www.unwatch.org/goldstone.
 
________________________
 
The U.K. appeal
 
Professor Christine Chinkin
Law Department
London School of Economics
Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE
 
10 September 2009
 
Dear Professor Chinkin,
 
We wish to express our support for the UN Watch request that you be disqualified from the United Nations Human Rights Council's fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict and our disappointment that this well-founded request was recently rejected by the mission, as reported by the Jewish Chronicle ("Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor," 28 August 2009).
 
Judge Richard Goldstone, as head of the mission, promised at the outset that it would be impartial. Impartiality requires that fact-finders be free of any commitment to a preconceived outcome. Because you expressed yourself on the merits of the issues prior to seeing any of the evidence, you cannot be considered impartial.
 
On 11 January 2009, The Sunday Times published a letter signed by you and others, which stated that you "categorically reject" Israel's claim that its military operation in Gaza constituted self-defence against the Hamas rocket attacks "deplorable as they are" and that "Israel's actions amount to aggression, not self-defence". You concluded that Israel was acting contrary to international law.
 
When you were asked about this during a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, you denied that your impartiality was compromised, saying that your Sunday Times letter only addressed jus ad bellum, and not jus in bello. (Audio recording at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfiHbvTpmKQ.)
 
However, your letter to The Sunday Times was not limited to Israel's decision to conduct a military operation in Gaza. It also expressed the categorical view that the Palestinians killed in the operation were "mostly civilians", that humanitarian relief was blockaded by Israel, and that the operation was contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law. It concluded that "the manner and scale of [Israel's] operations in Gaza amount to an act of aggression and is contrary to international law".
 
All these issues clearly bear on the fact-finding mission in which you are engaged. As you know, all are disputed. As a professor of international law at the London School of Economics, you must recognize that your actions have given rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As colleagues in the law and academia, each of us committed to fairness and the principle that justice must be seen to be done, we are disappointed that you have refused to step down. Your continued participation necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report.
 
Yours faithfully
 
Nigel Peters QC
 
Avril Mailer
 
Caroline Turner
 
Alan Steinfeld QC
 
Professor Ashley Grossman
 
Daniel Janner QC
 
Daniel Weiner
 
David Halpern QC
 
David Ziskind
 
Dr Howard Kahn
 
Jonathan Arkush
 
Jonathan Fisher QC
 
Jonathan D. C. Turner
 
Laura Dahan
 
Philip Gershuny
 
Rebekah Gershuny
 
Simon Monty QC
 
Simon Myerson QC
 
Jonathan Lux
 
__________________________
 
The Canadian appeal
 
Click here for PDF
 
Professor Christine Chinkin
Law Department
London School of Economics
Houghton Street
London, WC2A 2AE
 
September 11, 2009
 
Dear Professor Chinkin,
 
We wish to express our support for the UN Watch request that you be disqualified from the United Nations Human Rights Council's fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict and our disappointment that this well-founded request was recently rejected by the mission, as reported by London's Jewish Chronicle ("Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor," 28 August 2009).
 
Judge Richard Goldstone, as head of the mission, promised at the outset that it would be impartial. Impartiality requires that fact-finders be free of any commitment to a preconceived outcome. Because you expressed yourself on the merits of the issues prior to seeing any of the evidence, you cannot be considered impartial.
 
On 11 January 2009, The Sunday Times published a letter signed by you and others, which stated that you "categorically reject" Israel's right to claim self-defence against Hamas rocket attacks "deplorable as they are" and that "Israel's actions amount to aggression, not self-defence". You concluded that Israel was acting contrary to international law.
 
When you were asked about this during a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, you denied that your impartiality was compromised, saying that your Sunday Times letter only addressed jus ad bellum, and not jus in bello. (Audio recording at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfiHbvTpmKQ.)
 
However, your letter to The Sunday Times was not limited to Israel's decision to conduct a military operation in Gaza. It also expressed the categorical view that the Palestinians killed in the operation were "mostly civilians", that humanitarian relief was blockaded by Israel, and that the operation was contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law. It concluded that "the manner and scale of [Israel's] operations in Gaza amount to an act of aggression and is contrary to international law".
 
All these are disputed issues which must surely bear on the fact-finding mission in which you are engaged. As a professor of international law at the London School of Economics, it behooves you to recognize that your actions have given rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. Your refusal to step down necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report.
 
Yours faithfully,
 
Noam Goodman
 
Stanley W L Freedman
 
Eric M. Levy
 
David Matas Q.C.
 
Allan Adel
 
Marvin Kurtz
 
Anita Bromberg
 
Monty Warsh
 
Ari Itman
 
Jeffrey Citron
 
David Nadler
 
Jason Caron
 
Alan Grad
 
Alan Litwack
 
Andrea Safer
 
Lawrence Witt
 
Tibor Hollander
 
Norman Bacal
 
Saul Schipper
 
David Chodikoff
 
Andrew Cohen
 
Aren Prupas
 
Dean Chenoy
 
Joel Goldberg
 
Adam Kardash
 
Mark Jadd
 
Hayden Solomons
 
David M. Goodman
 
Danny Kaufer
 
Adam S. Goodman
 
David Steinberg
 
Igor Ellyn Q.C.


Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors. Originally posted at http://zionism-israel.com/israel_news/2009/09/lawyers-challenge-goldstones-un-gaza.html. Please do link to these articles, quote from them and forward them by email to friends with this notice. Other uses require written permission of the author.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment



<< Home


FREE EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION
Subscribe to
ZNN
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by groups.yahoo.com


Feedblitz subcription
To this Blog only

You can receive our articles by e-mail. For a free subscription, please enter your e-mail address:


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Web Logs & Sites

This Site

Zionism & Israel
Zionation Web Log
IMO Web Log (Dutch)

ZI Group
Zionism-Israel Pages
Israël-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Israël in de Media
MidEastWeb Middle East News and Views
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log

Brave Zionism
Israel: Like this, as if
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog

Friends and Partners
EinNews Israel
Israel Facts
Israel Proud Adam Holland
Middle East Analysis
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Middle East Analysis
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Israpundit
Israel Facts (NL)
Cynthia's Israel Adventure
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Meretz USA Weblog
Pro-Israel Bay Bloggers
Simply Jews
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
Sharona's Week
Z-Word Blog
Z-Word
Jewish State
Take A Pen - Israel Advocacy
Zionism on the Web
UN-Biased
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Zionism
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Southern Wolf
Peace With Realism
Sanda's Place
Liberal for Israel
Realistic Dove
Blue Truth
Point of no Return
Christians Standing With Israel
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog
Liberticracia
CNPublications
SEO

Reference
Zionism
Anti-Semitism
Anti-Zionism
Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
Bible
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism & the creation of Israel
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Christian Zionism Resources
Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Islamism
Jihad
Zionist Quotes
Six Day War
Jew Hatred
Israel
Jew
Learn Hebrew
Arab-Israeli Conflict
International Zionism
Russian

Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Israel Boycott
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War
Boycott Israel?
Dutch Newspaper Reporting: A Study of NRC Handelsblad
Hamas (Dutch)
Dries van Agt (Dutch)
Experimental
Isfake lobby
Mysterology

At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica & Israel Gifts
Jewish Gifts: Judaica:
Ahava Products
Mezuzah

Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]


RSS V 1.0

International Affairs Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory