What is the status of Jerusalem?
|Zionism||Zionism on the Web||definitions||about||FAQ||history||timeline||documents||links||personalities||antizionism||contact|
Control over the West Bank and Gaza passed to Israel in 1967 in a war of self-defense [the Six Day War]. For nearly a
quarter of a century afterwards, the Palestinians rejected every Israeli overture, missing opportunity after opportunity
to peacefully resolve the dispute through negotiation. In 2005, Israel then decided to leave Gaza unilaterally, passing
control over this territory to the Palestinians themselves in the hope that they would use it to establish the base of a
peaceful future Palestinian state. Sadly, Israel's hopes were dashed.
As long as the future status of the West Bank is subject to negotiation, Israel's claim to this disputed territory is no less valid than that of the Palestinians. This territory held the cradle of Jewish civilization during biblical times and Jewish communities existed there over thousands of years. Modern-day Israel has deep ties to the many historical sites located in the West Bank. Yet Israel's claim to this territory is based not only on its ancient ties, religious beliefs and security needs; it is also firmly grounded in international law and custom.
Israel's presence in the West Bank and Gaza Strip dated back to 1967 and the Six Day War. It is important to remember that Israel's control of the territories was the result of a war of self-defense, fought after Israel's very existence was threatened. It has continued due to the intransigence of Israel's Arab neighbors, who steadfastly rejected Israel's many offers of peace, including its post-Six Day War message that it would exchange most of the territory in return for peace. In 1979, Egypt and in 1994, Jordan both signed peace treaties with Israel. But the Palestinians have yet to do so.
It has been asserted that Israel's presence in the territories violated UN Security Council Resolution 242 of 1967,
one of the cornerstones of the peace process. This allegation ignores both the language and the original intent of 242.
The framers of this resolution realized that the pre-1967 borders were indefensible, and deliberately chose to use the
term withdrawal "from territories" (and not "from all the territories" as the Palestinians claim) in order to indicate
the need to change any future borders.
Moreover, Resolution 242 (and Resolution 338 of 1973) places obligations on both sides. The Arab regimes cannot
demand that Israel withdraw while they ignore their own responsibilities and the need for negotiations. They
deliberately overlook the fact that 242 calls for the "termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and the
"right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force."
Israel's presence in the territory is often incorrectly referred to as an "occupation." However, under international
law, occupation occurs in territories that have been taken from a recognized sovereign. The Jordanian rule over the West
Bank and the Egyptian rule over the Gaza Strip following 1948 resulted from a war of aggression aimed at destroying the
newly established Jewish State. Their attacks plainly violated UN General Assembly Resolution 181 from 1947 (also known
as the Partition Plan). Accordingly, the Egyptian and Jordanian seizures of the territories were never recognized by the
international community. As neither territory had a prior legitimate sovereign, under international law these areas
could not be considered as occupied and their most accurate description would be that of disputed territories.
Palestinian spokespersons not only claim that the territory is occupied, they also allege that occupation is - by
definition - illegal. However, international law does not prohibit situations of occupation. Rather, it attempts to
regulate such situations with international agreements and conventions. Therefore, claims that the so-called Israeli
"occupation" is illegal - without regard either to its cause or the factors that have led to its continuation - are
baseless allegations without foundation in international law.
Palestinian efforts to present Israel's presence in the territory as the primary cause of the conflict ignore
history. Palestinian terrorism predates Israel's control of the territories (and even the existence of the State of
Israel itself). The Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was founded in 1964, three years before Israel's presence
in the territories began. Moreover, Palestinian terrorism has often peaked during those periods when a negotiated
settlement was closest at hand, whether at the height of the Oslo process in the mid-1990s or after Israel's
unprecedented peace proposals at Camp David and Taba in 2000.
There are those that claim that if only the clock could be turned back to 1967 (i.e. a full Israeli withdrawal from
all the territories) the conflict would be resolved, and no border issues would need to be resolved. It is important to
remember that in 1967, there was no such entity as a Palestinian state and that there was no link between Gaza and the
West Bank. Yet still its Arab neighbors threatened Israel with destruction. What Israel is now being asked to create a
totally new construction, whose product must be the result of direct negotiations between the two parties.
The West Bank can best regarded as disputed territory over which there are competing claims that should be resolved in peace talks. The final status of this disputed territory can only be determined through negotiations between the parties. Attempts to force a solution through terrorism are ethically indefensible and only serve to encourage further violence and terrorism.
These texts are taken from material published by the Israel Ministry of Foreign affairs. with additional comments and hyperlinked materials. They were apparently published in connection with the Annapolis peace conference of 2007, but they have extensive applicability beyond it. They explain fundamentals of Israeli policy as well as the meaning of Zionism and history of the conflict.
Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs text is at Israel, the Conflict and Peace. Original text is copyright by Ami Isseroff and Zionism-Israel Center.
Back to Zionism and Israel - Issues and Answers - Main page
More About Zionism:
This page is copyright ©2005-6 by Zionism and Israel Information Center and Ami Isseroff. You are welcome to quote or selectively use materials from this page - for nonprofit use in promoting Zionism and the Israeli cause only. However, do not copy entire pages, and remember to credit Zionism and Israel Information Center, linking to http://www.zionism-israel.com Information about Zionism and Israel . and to t - Zionism and Israel - Issues and Answers FAQ.
This site provides resources about Zionism and Israeli history, including links to source documents. We are not responsible for the information content of these sites.
Friends and informative sites:
MidEastWeb: Middle East - Proactive for peace and democracy in the Middle East.
Zionism - Definition and Brief History - A balanced article that covers the definitions and history of Zionism as well as opposition to Zionism and criticisms by Arabs, Jewish anti-Zionists.
Labor Zionism - Early History and Critique - Contribution of Labor Zionism to the creation of the Jewish state, and problems of Labor Zionism in a changing reality.
Dvar Dea - Zionism & Israel Advocacy
- (Dutch) Middle East Conflict, Israel, Palestine,Zionism...
Israël-Palestina Informatie -gids Israël, Zionisme, Palestijnen
en Midden-Oosten conflict...
Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a European perspective - Dutch and English. ZioNation - Zionism-Israel Web Log
Israel News Israel: like this, as if Albert Einstein Bible History of Zionism Zionism FAQ Zionism Israel CenterMaps of Israel
Zionism and its Impact
Israel Israel News Israel: like
this, as if Christian Zionism
Albert Einstein Bible
Israel-Palestina - (Dutch) Middle East Conflict, Israel, Palestine,Zionism... Israël-Palestina Informatie -gids Israël, Zionisme, Palestijnen en Midden-Oosten conflict... Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a European perspective - Dutch and English.
ZioNation - Zionism-Israel Web Log Israel News Israel: like this, as if Albert Einstein Bible History of Zionism Zionism FAQ Zionism Israel CenterMaps of Israel Zionism and its Impact Israel Israel News Israel: like this, as if Christian Zionism Albert Einstein Bible