ZioNation - Progressive Zionism and Israel Web Log

ZioNation home Archives Site map Policy Definitions FAQ timeline history documents Links Anti-Semitism inside Prisons Contact

Articles and Reference

History of Zionism and Israel
Middle East Encyclopedia
History of Anti-Semitism
History of Anti-Zionism
Encylopedic Dictionary of Zionism and Israel
Zionism and its Impact
Zionism - Issues & answers
Maps of Israel
Six Day War
War of Independence
Bible †Quotes
1948 Israel War of Independence Timeline Christian Zionism
Christian Zionism History
Gaza & the Qassam Victims of Sderot
Zionist Quotes
Learn Hebrew
Israel Boycott?
Boycott Israel?
Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel
Jew Hate
International Zionism
Commentary in Russian
Middle East
The Grand Mufti Hajj Amin Al Husseini
Albert Einstein
Palestine: Ethnic Cleansing
History Arab-Israeli Conflict
Boycott Israel?
Amnesty International Report on Gaza War

Subscribe to
email newsletter for this site and others

Powered by†groups.yahoo.com

Israel is obsessing over the settlement freeze, ignoring a dangerous Palestinian plan to unilaterally declare statehood with EU backing.

The Israeli government has dithered about the issue of the settlement freeze, as though it is the most important foreign policy issue. The government announced a non-freeze - no new housing units would be built, except for the ones that would be built. Then it announced that an additional 300 or 400 units would be built. Then it developed that most of these units were already planned and approved. What was the point of announcing these non-additional additional units, other than to annoy the Americans and give the Palestinians a cause for complaint?

The issue of settlement freeze was a red herring roadblock to negotiations thrown up by the Palestinians who evidently have their own reasons for evading negotiations. 300 or 400 extra settlement units are not going to determine the future of any area in the territories, and they should not determine the fate of the peace talks. If it is ever settled, Israel, the Palestinians and the United States will need to deal with Palestinian refusal to grant any Israeli claims in Jerusalem, refusal to recognize Israel as the Jewish national home and insistence on the "right" of descendants of Palestinian refugees to "return" to Israel by the millions (most never lived in Israel) in order to destroy Zionism and the Jewish state. Those should be the priority issues.

Meanwhile, the threat of a unilateral Palestinian state looms large and potent, and eclipses the petty obsession with settlement units. In July, the unfortunately irrepressible Javier Solana offered support of the EU for unconditional acceptance of a Palestinian state as a member of the UN in two years, if negotiations fail. At the end of August, the "moderate" Palestinian Authority announced that it would declare a state in two years, regardless of negotiations. Solana welcomed this provocation as well. Of course, the Palestinians only have to continue insisting on impossible peace conditions in order for the peace process to fail. Then the approval of the European Union and perhaps the United States for a unilaterally declared Palestinian state would have a suitable excuse. There is little evidence that anyone in Jerusalem is considering the issue seriously. The Israel Foreign Ministry did indeed "blast" Solana's statement, but there is no evidence that any action was taken to reverse the EU position. Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman likewise protested the Palestinian announcement, but if the government is considering the problem, nobody knows about it.

According to Akiva Eldar, the plan has gone one step further. With the support of the United States, open or otherwise, the European Union and perhaps the US are going to put forth a "peace" plan that would recognize the 1949 armistice lines as the permanent border of Israel and "advance" (or coerce) a peace plan that would require Israeli withdrawal, but does not specify any Arab concessions whatever:

Due to the Palestinians' reservations over establishing a state with temporary borders, as was proposed during the second stage of the road map, this step will probably be defined as "early recognition" of Palestine.

It is understood that this will be accompanied by a public American and European declaration that the permanent border will be based on the border of June 4, 1967. Both sides may agree to alter the border based on territorial exchanges.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's refusal to discuss Jerusalem and the Palestinian refugees in the initial negotiation stages will not be allowed to delay the announcement of an independent Palestinian state.

Likewise, Netanyahu's demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, and that the Arab world embark on normalizing ties with Israel, will not constitute preconditions to an "early recognition" of Palestine. .

Eldar gives the impression that only Benjamin Netanyahu, who is presumably a narrow-minded reactionary, objects to flooding Israel with "returning" Palestinian refugees and only Benjamin Netanyahu insists that Israel is the national home of the Jewish people. Nobody except Netanyahu cares, especially not Eldar or Ha'aretz newspaper.
Ironically, the same Akiva Eldar, having delivered himself of the news of an enforced American-European "peace" that ignores Israeli rights, proclaims in an op-ed:

"The American designers of policy ... tend to sew the peace process according to the measures of the Israeli coalition."

What Israeli coalition would accept the nightmare plan that Eldar outlined?

Eldar's "plan" may be a bogey-man canard, product of his feverish imagination or the wishful thinking of Palestinians. The Palestinian plan for unilateral statehood, and Solana's support of the plan, are, however, facts in evidence. They coincide with the doctrine of Arab governments and analysts that the "peace" process consists of forcing Israel to give up all the territories taken in the Six Day War with no Arab or Palestinian concessions of any kind. The Palestinian unilateral state declaration, its quiet acceptance by the EU and possibly the United States and the the increasing diplomatic isolation and delegitimization of Israel all help to implement this plan.

The Palestinian state would be declared presumably after "reunification" of the Palestinian Authority and Hamas governments, on the basis of non-recognition of Israel as per the Egyptian plan that was leaked recently. Whatever the results of elections in this reunited Palestinian entity, it is improbable that Hamas would give up power voluntarily. Therefore, the threatened unilateral Palestinian state would be a Hamas state. The Palestinians would be free to pursue the "liberation" of Palestina irredenta with the blessings of Mr. Solana and the UN, since East Jerusalem as well as all settlements would be considered "occupied territory" and an incursion into the territory of the Palestinian state. Both rockets and UN resolutions initiated by the Palestinian state would rain down on Israel, until Israel was forced to bow to all Palestinian demands including "return" of refugees. At the very least, the plan is a device to force Israel to agree to all Palestinian demands, since almost anything is less bad than a unilaterally declared state, that has no treaty of any kind with Israel.

It seems absurd to pursue negotiations when the outcome has already been determined, but given US pressure, it does not seem Israel has much choice. The Palestinian state is still two years away, but the plan might be put forward by the EU or the United States in the near future.

Given the momentous implications of this plan, it is almost impossible to understand why Israel is ignoring it, and why Israeli policy is totally focused on the relatively minor issue of the settlement freeze.

Ami Isseroff

Original content is Copyright by the author 2009. Posted at ZioNation-Zionism and Israel Web Log, https://zionism-israel.com/log/archives/00000713.html where your intelligent and constructive comments are welcome. Disributed by ZNN list. Subscribe by sending a message to . Please forward by e-mail with this notice, cite this article and link to it. Other uses by permission only.

Click to Reddit! Facebook Share

add to del.icio.us

Add to digg - digg it

Replies: 2 Comments

Assuming the Palestinians are unwilling to make peace, and the offer of a independent state + peace with Israel is not going to get them to give up their desire to eliminate Israel, isn't it better for Israel to deal with a recognized Palestinian state with which it has territorial disputes than with partially occupied Palestinians who are treated as if they are fully occupied?

The threats and pressures on Israel will remain the same but the occupation will no longer be used as a tool to undermine the legitimacy of Israel.

In a way this is what even moderate right wing Israelis want, the ability to claim we are not occupiers while keeping as much as possible? Conversely, don't the Palestinians want to prolong the occupation and avoid peace so as to undermine Israel itself?

, Tuesday, September 15th

The Palestinians have no unity. Neither Fatah nor Hamas will accept being ruled by the other. That said, any unilateral Palestinian declaration of independence would render the Oslo Accords null and void. If the Palestinians want to take unilateral measures, there is no reason Israel should refrain from taking its own steps. The world, Akiva Eldar and Haaretz may not care - but Israel should declare at a minimum, Yesha will be annexed if the Palestinians renege on their undertaking to resolve the dispute between them and Israel by peaceful means. A unilateral move is not a one-way street.

, Monday, September 14th

Constructive comments, including corrections, are welcome. Do not use this space for spam, publishing articles, self promotion, racism, anti-Zionist propaganda or character defamation. Inappropriate comments will be deleted. See our Comment policy for details. By posting here, you agree to the Comment policy.


Please take our reader survey!

Our Sites

Zionism News Net
Zionism-Israel Pages
Brave Zionism
IsraŽl-Palestina.Info (Dutch & English)
Our Blogs
Israel News
IMO Blog - IsraŽl & Midden-Oosten (NL)
Israel Like this, as if
Zionism News Net
Israel & Palestijnen Nieuws Blog
IsraŽl in de Media

Blog Roll:
Adam Holland
Blue Truth
CIF Watch
Contentious Centrist
Dutchblog Israel (NL/EN)
Harry's Place
Ignoble Experiment
Irene Lancaster's Diary
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Jeff Weintraub Commentaries and controversies
Jewish Issues Watchdog Meretz USA Weblog
Meryl Yourish
Middle East Analysis
MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log
Modernity Blog
Pro Israel Bay Bloggers
Point of no return
Simply Jews
Something Something
Tempting Topical Topics
The Augean Stables
Unplugged Mike
Oy Bay! San Francisco Bay Area Jews
Vital Perspective
Israel Mon Amour
Liberty & Justice
On the Contrary
Magdeburger Chossid
Tulip - Israeli-Palestinian Trade Union Assoc.
Southern Wolf
Sharona's Week
Sanda & Israel
Fresno Zionism
Anti-Racist Blog
ZOTW's Zionism and Israel News
Zionism On The Web News
ZOTW's Blogs
Christian Attitudes
Dr Ginosar Recalls
Questions: Zionism anti-Zionism Israel & Palestine
Liberal for Israel

A Jew with a view
Realistic Dove
Christians Standing With Israel - Blog
SEO for Everyone
Vision to Reality: The Reut Blog
Calev's Blog
Candidly speaking from Jerusalem
Dvar Dea
Ray Cook
Shimshon 9

Mark Halawa

This link space is 4 your blog - contact us!

Other Web sites and pages:

PeaceWatch Middle East Commentary Christians Standing With Israel
Zionism On the Web
Guide to Middle East, Zionism
Z-Word blog
Labor Zionism
Le Grand Mufti Husseini
The Grand Mufti Hajj Amin El Husseini
ZNN - Zionism News Network Middle East
Euston Manifesto
Jewish Blogging
Peace With Realism
Israel Facts (NL)
Space Shuttle Blog
Love Poems
At Zionism On the Web
Articles on Zionism
Anti-Zionism Information Center
Academic boycott of Israel Resource Center
The anti-Israel Hackers
Antisemitism Information Center
Zionism Israel and Apartheid
Middle East, Peace and War
The Palestine state
ZOTW Expert Search
ZOTW Forum

Judaica: Jewish Gifts:

RSS V 1.0

RSS V 2.0

Home Ľ Archives Ľ September 2009 Ľ Unilateral Palestinian state declaration - More important than settlement freeze

[Previous entry: "Protocols of the Elders of Anti-Zion: The Palestinian 'one state' threat is back"] [Next entry: "J Street and designer political opinions"]

Help us improve - Please click here to take our reader survey

All entries copyright by the authors and or Zionism-Israel Information Center. Please forward materials by e-mail with URLS. Other uses by permission only.